The Role of Documentary Film in Food Politics
IMPORTANT UPDATE: The class has been moved to RAI 116 beginning April 2.
Instructor: Professor Ann Anagnost
Contact: anagnost@u.washington.edu.
Instructor Office Hours: After class, or by appt. on Zoom
Class Time and Place: T Th, 2:30-4:20, RAI 116
Picardo Farm Garden Internship Program: Students enrolled for this course are welcome to register for 2 credits of ANTH 489. Follow this link for more information. Volunteers are also welcome if you would like to participate without credit. The garden internship may provide a good subject for the film projects of this course. |
Website Format:
I have endeavored to make this website as simple as possible by making course resources one-click away. This home page is the place to go for access to the Discussion Boards, Powerpoints, readings, films, and assignment drop boxes. I will be using the class email list to send updates and reminders for due dates, so please keep an eye out for those emails. Powerpoints will be uploaded before class for students who wish to use them as a platform for note taking. If you find that a link does not work or if you have other feedback on how the home page is working for you, please do not hesitate to let me know.
Attendance Policy:
Class attendance is important for this class. Our activities will include class discussion and group project time. See below for how class participation will be calculated for the final grade.
Please do not attend in-person if you are experiencing symptoms. It is important to let me know before class if you are not able to be in class due to illness or some other reason so we can figure out an accommodation.
Course Objectives:
This course is focused on creating useful tools for understanding the role of documentary film in public debates about contemporary food politics. We will be exploring a select series of films (out of an ever-expanding genre of food documentary) that explore many aspects of our food system, in particular, human health, environmental sustainability, multi-species ethics, and food access inequalities. We will be examining the rhetorical power of film to mobilize support for food change. What makes an effective film in terms of its ability to convey its message responsibly and engage viewers? Learning goals encompass both learning about the industrial food system and food change movements as well as how to convey our knowledge and passion for these issues to others through the medium of film.
- Tuesday classes will include a film viewing followed by discussion.
- Thursday classes will include lecture time, small-group discussion of the readings, and project time.
- Project time will be devoted to organizing the class into production teams to plan and produce a short cell phone video (5-10 minutes) on some aspect of food politics and ethics.
Discussion Posts:
This class is designed to encourage active discussion. In order for this course to work well, it is important to stay current with the readings and to be prepared to participate in class. Discussion will take place during class time and also through activity with the discussion boards on Canvas.
The graded assignments for this class is a discussion post (2-3 substantive paragraphs, 3 points each) for each set of readings and a one-paragraph response (1 points each) to another student's post. They are due midnight Wednesday before class on Thursday (with the exception of the first week due on Thursday before class). This will give me time to sort through the posts on Thursday morning as a preparation to lead the discussion in class. The in-class discussions constitute part of your grade. We will use a google doc as a means to document your small-group discussions followed by a report back to the class as a whole.
Grading Overview:
Discussion Posts (9 posts x 3 points) | 27 points |
Discussion Responses (9 responses x 1 point) | 9 points |
In-Class Discussion Participation (9 activities x 3 points) | 27 points |
Project Proposal (Due 4/16, midnight) | 4 points |
Progress Report (Due 4/30), midnight) | 4 points |
Story Board (Due 5/14, midnight) | 4 points |
Film Project: Completed Film (20 points) + 3 page written commentary (5 points) (Due 6/3, midnight) | 25 points |
Please Note: Final grades will not be calculated using the Canvas Grade Sheet. The total points will be added up, multiplied by 4, and divided by 100 to get the 4.0 equivalent.
Discussion Prompts and Reading Assignments:
The content of the post should reference the readings for that day as well as references to the film viewed the week previously. The content of the discussion posts can take different forms. Here are a few suggestions to prompt your approach:
- Identify a critical term or a particular theoretical framing that the author is using. Does it help you view something in a new and mind-altering way?
- Identify an "aha!" moment that particularly struck you in what you are learning from the reading.
- Make a connection between the reading assignments and the films assigned for this course. How does the visual material complement or complicate your understanding of the written material.
- Identify a passage that you are wanting to understand more clearly. What is not clear to you and what might help you to comprehend what the author is saying.
Please note that to receive full credit for your post, you need to identify a passage in the reading by page number to respond to the prompt. Merely responding to the films will not be sufficient to receive full credit.
Assigned Book (available as an ebook in the UW Library):
- Louise Spence and Vinicius Navarro, Crafting Truth: Documentary Form and Meaning. Rutgers U. Press, 2011.
Shorter Readings:
- W.J.T. Mitchell, "Representation." In Critical Terms for Literary Study, Frank Lentricchia and Thomas McLaughlin,eds. U. Chicago Press, 1990,
- Laura Lindenfeld, "Digging Down to the Roots: On the Radical Potential of Documentary Food Films." Radical History Review 110 (Spring 2011): 155-160.
- Jennifer M. Barker, "Chew on This: Disgust, Delay, and the Documentary Image in Food, Inc." Film Philosophy 15,2 (2011): 70-89.
- Belinda Small, Regarding Life.
- Ryanne Pilgeram and Russell Meeuf, "Good Food, Good Intentions: Where Pro-Sustainability Arguments Get Stale in US Food Documentaries." Environmental Communication 9,1(2015): 100-117.
- David Montgomery, et al. "Soil Health and Nutrient Density." PeerJ (2022).
- Cusworth, George, et al. "Green Rebranding: Regenerative Agriculture, Future-Pasts, and the Naturalization of Livestock." Trans Inst Br Geogr 2022;47: 1009-1027.
- Melissa Montalvo, "Indigenous Food Sovereignty Movements Are Taking Back Ancestral Land." Civil Eats (2022).
- Patricia Klindienst, "The Gardens of Two Gullah Elders." The Earth Knows My Name (2007).
Requirements for Film Project
- Students will design and produce a 5-10 minute cell-phone documentary video about some aspect of food politics or ethics.
- Students are encouraged to work in production teams, but individual projects are also welcome.
- Project Proposal (Due 4/16, midnight): A one-page document that defines a topic and sets out a production plan. (4 points)
- Progress Report (Due 4/30, midnight): A 2-page document that describes filming locations, identifies possible interviewees and your progress in contacting them, sketches thematic/narrative/interview questions, determines format (film/slides/powerpoint). For those working in a group map out your planned division of labor and how you plan to complete your contribution to the group. (4 points)
- Story Board (Due 5/14, midnight): This can be done as a narrative script or as a set of images with commentary. Plot out the story arc for the film and what you still need to do to complete it. (4 points)
- Film Screening (Due 5/30, in class).
- Final Project (Due 6/3, midnight): Film Project (20 points) and a 3-page Written Commentary (15 points) detailing what you learned, and (for group projects) your contribution to the final product.
- The instructor will be available to meet with students working on projects after class on Monday or by appt on zoom.
- The instructor has lavaliere microphones to lend out to improve sound quality for filmed interviews.
- I have created a Google Doc as a Film Project Collaboration Space. You can post your ideas for a film project there to see if you can form a team around a topic. There is also a space for resource sharing. Here is the link.
Class Schedule
3/26 |
Introduction to Syllabus Home Viewing Assignment Film Screening: Food Inc (2008), 92 minutes |
Recommended Further Viewing: Fresh (2009), 70 minutes. (Link through UW Libraries Kanopy) Look out for Food Inc 2: Out this year. |
3/28 |
Lecture: Thinking Critically About Representation In-Class Viewing (Short Film Clips): Discussion Board (due Thursday midnight before class) |
Reading Assignment: Mitchell, "Representation." Barker, "Chew on This." pp. 70-89.
|
4/2 |
Film Screening: Our Daily Bread (2005), 92 minutes The class has moved to Raitt 116 as of April 2.
|
Questions for Viewing: How is this film the same or different from Food, Inc.? What questions did the film pose for you? What was the affective impact of the film (how did it make you feel)? Shock? Discomfort? Anger? Boredom? Pay attention to the sound dimension of this film. How would you describe it? Does it remind you of other films you may have seen?
|
4/4 |
Lecture: General Concepts Discussion Board (due Wednesday midnight before class) Small Group Discussion Google Doc
|
Reading Assignment: Spence and Navarro, pp. 11-58. (Link to ebook via UW Libraries). Small, Regarding Life, pp. 45-70. Recommended Viewing: Samsara (food footage) Examples of Student Projects: Sarah Ambruster, Let Them Eat Soup Vedika Bhat, Chai |
4/9 |
Film Screening: A Place at the Table (2012), 84 minutes,
|
We also viewed the short film This Lawn is Your Lawn by Roger Doiron. This is a good example of how still photos interspersed with text slides can be put together to create a narrative. There is no voiceover but there is music to tie it together. A very simple but effective way to deliver a message. It was consequential in persuading the Obamas to create a kitchen garden on the White House lawn.
|
4/11 |
Lecture: General Concepts II Discussion Board (due Wednesday midnight before class) |
Required reading: Spence and Navarro, pp. 59-112. Pilgeram and Meeuf, "Good Food, Good Intentions." Recommended Further Viewing: |
4/16 |
Film Screening: Symphony of the Soil (2012), 104 minutes Film Project Proposals Due: Drop Box: Please notice that the Drop Box closes on Friday midnight. |
Recommended Further Viewing: Fabulous Fungi (pay for view on Youtube)
|
4/18 |
Lecture Discussion Board (due Wednesday midnight before class) Small Group Discussion Google Doc
|
Reading Assignment: Spence and Navarro, pp. 113-134. Montgomery, "Soil Health and Nutrient Density." NYT, "Unearthing the Superpowers of Fungi." (As a UW student you are eligible for a free digital subscription to the New York TImes. Find out how using this link.)
|
4/23 |
Film Screening: Seed: The Untold Story 2016, 94 minutes.
|
Recommended Further Viewing: Percy vs Goliath (through Hoopla at the Seattle Public Library) This is a film drama depicted the court case between Canadian farmer Percy Schmeiser and Monsanto. Poisoning Paradise (Through the Seattle Public Library) |
4/25 |
Lecture Discussion Board (due Wednesday midnight before class) Small Group Discussion Google Doc In-Class Viewing: Omelia Contadina (JR and Alice Rohrwacher) Lavalier Mikes user support on Amazon (scroll down to reviews and videos) |
Reading Assignment: Spence and Navarro, pp. 135-160 "Gardening Is Important, But Seed Saving Is Crucial." Civil Eats (2020) The Sobering Details Behind the New Seed Monopoly Chart Civil Eats (2019) |
4/30 |
Film Screening: The Biggest Little Farm (2019), 91 minutes |
I just discovered that this film is no longer available through the Seattle Public Library. You can pay for view through Amazon Prime or Youtube for $3.99.
|
5/2 |
Lecture Discussion Board (due Wednesday midnight before class) Small Group Discussion Google Doc
|
Reading Assignment: Spence and Navarro, pp. 161-186 NYT, "It Was War."
|
5/7 |
Film Screening: Moo Man (2013), 97 minutes
|
Recommended Further Viewing: A Farm for the Future (2009), 49 minutes. Savory, TED Talk (22 minutes)
|
5/9 |
Lecture Discussion Board (due Wednesday midnight before class) Small Group Discussion Google Doc Equipment Reservation and Checkout List
|
Reading Assignment: Spence and Navarro, pp. 187-212. Richie Nimmo, "Biopolitics and Becoming in Animal-Technology Assemblages."
|
5/14 |
Film Screening: Gather (2020), 84 minutes Story Board (deadline extended until 5/17 midnight) |
Recommended Further Viewing: Tending the Wild (2017) Truly Texas Mexican (2021) Kitchenistas (2022)
|
5/16 |
Lecture Discussion Board (due date extended to F midnight) Small Group Discussion Google Doc
|
Reading Assignment: Spence and Navarro, pp. 213-238 Montalvo, "Indigeneous Food Sovereignty." Recommended Reading: "Organic Reach: Food Sovereignty Moves to the Web." High Country News
|
5/21 |
Film Screening: Farming While Black (2023), 77 minutes. We have permission for a pre-release, one-time streaming event for this film. It will not be available otherwise. Attendance for this class will not be optional, but required for your attendance grade. Film Response Google Doc (the filmmakers would like to hear back from you) |
Recommended Further Viewing: Growing Hope in the Urban Center (The story of Seattle's Clean Greens Farm) High on the Hog (Netflix Series) |
5/23 |
Lecture Discussion Board (due Wednesday midnight before class) Small Group Discussion Google Doc
|
Reading Assignment: Spence and Navarro, pp. 239-264. Klindienst, "The Gardens of Two Gullah Elders." Recommended Further Reading: Michael Twitty, The Cooking Gene (2018). This link is to the audio book. |
5/28 |
Office Hours (on Zoom) First hour: Open to all for discussing any issues with your film projects. Second hour: If you would like to schedule a one-on-one meeting with me, please sign up here. |
|
5/30 |
Filmmaker Showcase We will be viewing and discussing student films. It is fine if the film is still in progress. Please provide instructor with a link or some other means to screen your film in class. |
|
6/3 |
Google Dropbox for Presentations Final Reflection Paper (submit here) For garden interns: Final Reflection Paper (submit here)
|
Don't forget to return lavalier mikes if you borrowed one to prevent having your grade held up. |